baixar fortune rabbit Intellia Therapeutics's NTLA short percent of float has risen 15.57% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 18.91 million shares sold short , which is 21.15% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 5.83 days to cover their short positions on average. Why Short Interest Matters Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. Short selling is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises. Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish. See Also: List of the most shorted stocks Intellia Therapeutics Short Interest Graph (3 Months) As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for Intellia Therapeutics has grown since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to fall in the near-term but traders should be aware that more shares are being shorted. Comparing Intellia Therapeutics's Short Interest Against Its Peers Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis. According to Benzinga Pro , Intellia Therapeutics's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 13.63%, which means the company has more short interest than most of its peers. Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it. This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor. © 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.Zelda Books For 50% Off: Tears Of The Kingdom Guide, Two Breath Of The Wild Books, And MoreUK study warns of perils in AI-driven 'intention economy'

Did the US help create Covid-19? Ex-CDC chief carpet-bombs the official narrativeSujeet Indap in New York and Stephen Morris in San Francisco Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter. A judge in Delaware rejected Tesla’s attempt to restore Elon Musk’s record $56bn pay package after previously striking it down as a breach of the fiduciary duty of the electric-car maker’s board, dealing a blow to the world’s richest man. Judge Kathaleen McCormick wrote that Tesla’s unprecedented effort to push the 2018 pay package through a second time, four months after she first struck it down, was “creative”. But the board “had no procedural ground for flipping the outcome of an adverse post-trial decision based on evidence they created after trial,” she wrote. The decision from the Delaware Court of Chancery tees up an expected appeal to the Delaware Supreme Court, which will decide how much weight the decision by Tesla’s shareholders to approve it has at a moment when Musk’s social and political power is at its peak. Musk has gained the ear of US president-elect Donald Trump after spending more than $100mn on his re-election campaign. In return, Musk has gained sway over crucial cabinet appointments and made co-head of an advisory body that has vowed to dramatically shrink the federal budget. The pay package of just over 300mn Tesla shares would only vest if the company hit a series of difficult stock price and operational targets. McCormick, in her original ruling in February, said the Tesla board that approved the package six years ago was too cozy with Musk, and that her analysis of the pay award showed that it could not be justified on any reasonable metric. Tesla stock has surged 44 per cent this year, much of that coming after Trump’s election victory on November 5. That means the stock options in Musk’s pay package have soared in value to $108bn. If it is ultimately granted, the package would increase his ownership stake from just under 13 per cent to more than 20 per cent. After McCormick struck down Musk’s pay package the first time, Tesla put identical terms — with enhanced disclosures — to a shareholder vote in June. It passed with 72 per cent support. Shareholders also approved a separate plan to reincorporate the company from Delaware, where the vast majority of big public US companies are listed, to Texas, where several other Musk-controlled companies are based. Since the February decision, Musk has loudly complained about the Delaware corporate law court and has moved all of his companies incorporations to either Nevada or Texas. Delaware’s status as the premiere destination for public companies’ legal domiciles has since become a lingering issue for the state. Recommended Last month, Musk posted on his social media platform X: “When there are egregiously wrong legal judgments in a single state that substantially harm American citizens in all other 49 states, the Federal government should take immediate corrective action.” Lawyers for the shareholder who brought the original suit were also awarded $345mn in fees, instead of the $5.6bn in Tesla shares that they had requested, according to Monday’s decision. Lawyers at the firm Bernstein Litowitz, who had represented the Tesla shareholder who brought the suit, had said that based on the $56bn value of the cancelled stock grant, they were owed $5.6bn in shares. McCormick rejected that, however. She said that the lower amount of $345mn, payable in cash or Tesla stock, was sufficient, estimating that the value returned to shareholders was closer to $2.3bn, pointing to an accounting charge it took in 2018.NoneTrudeau Told Trump Americans Would Also Suffer if Tariffs Are Imposed, a Canadian Minister Says

Steps for Early Cancer Setection and Prevention: Collector( MENAFN - GlobeNewsWire - Nasdaq) MONTREAL, Dec. 24, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Mosaic Minerals Corporation (CSE: MOC) (“Mosaic” or“the Company”) announces some updates about the Company and takes this opportunity to thank its shareholders, partners and suppliers for their trust throughout 2024 and wishes them a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year 2025. Mirabelli and Maqua Results The Company announces that it has received all its results related to the summer and fall 2024 exploration campaigns on the Mirabelli SM and Maqua SM properties. These do not reveal any significant grades in the metals and minerals initially sought. Management announces that exploration work will not be continued on these properties. The Company also announces that it no longer intends to continue exploration related to Lithium and will focus on the gold potential of its properties, in particular, the Amanda project now 100% owned and which contains numerous gold showings. Lichen and 113 North Projects Mosaic announces that it has received formal notification from Castlebar Capital Corporation that it is abandoning the option agreement to acquire 100% of the Lichen property (see press release dated June 11, 2024 ). Mosaic is regaining control of this property which consists of 282 claims covering a total area of ​​15,622 hectares and is located approximately 100 km west of the Chibougamau mining camp. The property is underlain by volcanic rocks of the Obatogamau Formation intersected by intermediate stocks and plutons. The volcanic belt parallels two known gold-bearing volcanic belts, the Bachelor Lake gold zone to the west and the Osisko-Windfall gold zone to the south. The Nelligan and Monster Lake gold projects are located at the eastern end of the volcanic belt. The Company also announces that it has received formal notification from Panther Minerals Inc. (formerly Lithium Lion Metals Inc.) that the latter is abandoning the option agreement to acquire 100% of the 113 North property (see press release dated December 5, 2023 ). Mosaic is regaining control of this property which is located in the southeastern part of the Abitibi Greenstone Belt and comprises 59 cells totaling 3,010 hectares within a 6- to 12-kilometre-wide band of volcano-sedimentary rocks located between the Josselin and Montgay granodiorite-tonalite batholiths. The volcanic rocks in this group have felsic, intermediate and mafic compositions and are cut by dunite, gabbro and diorite dykes. Iron formations (sulphides and oxides) and clastic sedimentary rocks, such as greywackes and schists, are also present. Gold, copper, nickel, platinum and palladium occurrences have been discovered in this geological environment near the project. The scientific and technical information of Mosaic Minerals Corporation included in this press release has been reviewed and approved by Gilles Laverdière, P.Geo, Vice-President Exploration of Mosaic Minerals and qualified person under National Instrument 43-101 respecting information concerning mining projects (“Regulation 43-101”). About Mosaic Minerals Corporation Mosaic Minerals Corp. is a Canadian mining exploration company listed on the Canadian Securities Exchange (CSE: MOC) focusing on the exploration of critical minerals such as Nickel in the province of Quebec. Source: M. Jonathan Hamel President & CEO ... This release contains certain“forward-looking information” under applicable Canadian securities laws concerning the Arrangement. Forward-looking information reflects the Company's current internal expectations or beliefs and is based on information currently available to the Company. In some cases, forward-looking information can be identified by terminology such as“may”,“will”,“should”,“expect”,“intend”,“plan”,“anticipate”,“believe”,“estimate”,“projects”,“potential”,“scheduled”,“forecast”,“budget” or the negative of those terms or other comparable terminology. Assumptions upon which such forward-looking information is based includes, among others, that the conditions to closing of the Arrangement will be satisfied and that the Arrangement will be completed on the terms set out in the definitive agreement. Many of these assumptions are based on factors and events that are not within the control of the Company, and there is no assurance they will prove to be correct or accurate. Risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted herein include, without limitation: that the remaining conditions to the Arrangement will not be satisfied; that the business prospects and opportunities of the Company will not proceed as anticipated; changes in the global prices for gold or certain other commodities (such as diesel, aluminum and electricity); changes in U.S. dollar and other currency exchange rates, interest rates or gold lease rates; risks arising from holding derivative instruments; the level of liquidity and capital resources; access to capital markets, financing and interest rates; mining tax regimes; ability to successfully integrate acquired assets; legislative, political or economic developments in the jurisdictions in which the Company carries on business; operating or technical difficulties in connection with mining or development activities; laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment; employee relations; availability and increasing costs associated with mining inputs and labour; the speculative nature of exploration and development; contests over title to properties, particularly title to undeveloped properties; and the risks involved in the exploration, development and mining business. Risks and unknowns inherent in all projects include the inaccuracy of estimated reserves and resources, metallurgical recoveries, capital and operating costs of such projects, and the future prices for the relevant minerals. The Canadian Securities Exchange does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION IN THE UNITED STATES OR ANY US NEWS WIRE SERVICES AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER OF THE TITLES DESCRIBED HEREIN. MENAFN24122024004107003653ID1109028413 Legal Disclaimer: MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.

Milei’s first year ends with optimism. Can Argentina’s momentum continue in 2025?None

TikToker teaching science hopes short-form video will become part of curriculum

Amid controversy about the Fortnite collab, a Cyberpunk 2077 developer has explained why the female V avatar was chosen over the male version. Following several leaks and rumors, Cyberpunk 2077’s Fortnite collab went live on December 23, introducing Johnny Silverhand and V to the battle royale. The crossover stirred up quite a bit of controversy, though, with many fans of the CD Projekt Red title upset that male V didn’t make the cut like his female counterpart. Some dubbed it “erasure,” while others argued CDPR probably associates male V with the game’s broken launch, hence female V being more prominent during the marketing for Update 2.0 and Phantom Liberty. One developer has offered a simpler explanation. Cyberpunk 2077 dev explains decision behind Fortnite V skin In response to the backlash, Cyberpunk Senior Quest Designer, Patrick K. Mills, said picking female V for the Fortnite skin was ultimately his call. Johnny Silverhand counted as the male representation for the collab, thus including a female character helped balance things out. “...I like femme V a little better and we already had a masc character in the form of Johnny,” Mills wrote on Twitter/X (via SparkyFunbuck ). He then explained that while each version of V is great, they couldn’t “do both in this collab, so a choice had to be made.” Ahead of the crossover content’s release, Cyberpunk 2077 fans hoped male V would feature in an Edit Style as an alternative outfit. Mills’ comments indicate this wasn’t an option at all. Related: In addition to the Johnny and V skins, Fortnite x Cyberpunk 2077 also includes items such as the Mantis Blades pickaxe and a backbling styled after Johnny’s Arasaka nuke . Players can purchase all of the above in a bundle for 2,800 V-Bucks, though those wanting to grab Cyberpunk’s Quadra Turbo-R car will have to fork over an extra 1,800 V-Bucks.

Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Netflix has shared an exciting update on Prince Harry 's forthcoming documentary series. The five-part docuseries, produced by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex , is set to premiere on December 10, as announced on Wednesday. The eagerly-awaited show, named POLO, tracks polo players "on and off the field as they compete in the high-stakes US Open Polo Championship in Wellington, Florida", according to Netflix. The streaming giant revealed: "Through fierce rivalries and intense training, viewers will get an unprecedented glimpse into the dedication and skill required to compete at the sport's highest level." It's no secret that the Duke of Sussex, 40, has been a polo player for years and is a big fan of the equestrian sport. "From a young player pushed to his limits by his demanding father, to a former golfer who's made significant sacrifices for the love of the sport, to the father-son duo widely regarded as the greatest players of all time - they all face intense personal and professional challenges as they vie for the coveted title," Netflix elaborated. This latest update follows Netflix's announcement of the documentary series on X in September. The statement read: "POLO is a new documentary series that follows elite global players and offers an exclusive, behind-the-scenes look at the fast-paced world of the sport. From Archewell Productions and Boardwalk Pictures." Archewell Productions, the company owned by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, is set to release a new show as part of their multi-year deal with Netflix, signed in 2020. Meghan will also be hosting her own non-fiction series, celebrating "the joys of cooking, gardening, entertaining and friendship". Netflix has already given fans a sneak peek of the documentary with four still images, including a shot of three polo players on horseback and two competitors sprinting with mallets after the ball. While Harry and Meghan may make brief appearances, the focus won't be on them. Back in April, it was revealed that Harry had signed a deal with Netflix to produce a documentary series about the intriguing sport of polo. The series promises to "provide viewers unprecedented access to the world of professional polo," according to a statement released at the time. "Known primarily for its aesthetic and social scene, the series will pull the curtain back on the grit and passion of the sport, capturing players and all it takes to compete at the highest level," it read. Harry's friend and fellow polo player, Ignacio 'Nacho' Figueras, is working closely with the Duke on the show. Discussing the upcoming polo-themed project with People, he shared: "Prince Harry and I have talked about polo for years. The production company is incredible, and Netflix has a huge platform to reach the biggest hearts in the world. I am happy to be involved and think this is a great opportunity for the sport."