jilimacao promo code 2024 Phillies add depth to bullpen with $4 million, 1-year deal for reliever Joe Ross

Turned away at the doorMinimum wage: The Nasarawa perspectiveOrca carried her dead calf for 17 days. She now has a new baby

Most ruling party lawmakers were boycotting a parliamentary vote Saturday to deny a two-thirds majority sought by the opposition to impeach President Yoon Suk Yeol over his short-lived imposition of martial law, as protests grew nationwide calling for his removal. The likely defeat of the motion is expected to intensify public protests calling for Yoon's ouster and deepen political chaos in South Korea, with a survey suggesting a majority of South Koreans support the president's impeachment. Yoon's martial law declaration drew criticism from his own ruling conservative party, but it is also determined to oppose Yoon's impeachment apparently because it fears losing presidency to liberals. Impeaching Yoon would require support from two-thirds of the National Assembly, or 200 of its 300 members. The opposition parties who brought the impeachment motion have 192 seats, meaning they need at least eight additional votes from Yoon's People Power Party. The opposition-controlled parliament began a vote earlier Saturday, but only three lawmakers from PPP took part with opposition members. If the number of lawmakers who cast ballots doesn't reach 200, the motion will be scrapped at midnight, according to National Assembly. Opposition parties could submit a new impeachment motion after a new parliamentary session opens next Wednesday. National Assembly Speaker Woo Won Shik urged ruling party members to return to the chamber to participate in the vote, stressing that it was closely watched by the nation and also the world. "Don't make a shameful judgment and please vote based on your convictions," Woo said. "I plead to you, for the future of the Republic of Korea." Earlier Saturday, Yoon issued a public apology over the martial law decree, saying he won't shirk legal or political responsibility for the declaration and promising not to make another attempt to impose martial law. He said would leave it to his party to chart a course through the country's political turmoil, "including matters related to my term in office." "The declaration of this martial law was made out of my desperation. But in the course of its implementation, it caused anxiety and inconveniences to the public. I feel very sorry over that and truly apologize to the people who must have been shocked a lot," Yoon said. Since taking office in 2022, Yoon has struggled to push his agenda through an opposition-controlled parliament and grappled with low approval ratings amid scandals involving himself and his wife. In his martial law announcement on Tuesday night, Yoon called parliament a "den of criminals" bogging down state affairs and vowed to eliminate "shameless North Korea followers and anti-state forces." The turmoil resulting from Yoon's bizarre and poorly-thought-out stunt has paralyzed South Korean politics and sparked alarm among key diplomatic partners, including neighboring Japan and Seoul's top ally the United States, as one of the strongest democracies in Asia faces a political crisis that could unseat its leader. Tuesday night saw special forces troops encircling the parliament building and army helicopters hovering over it, but the military withdrew after the National Assembly unanimously voted to overturn the decree, forcing Yoon to lift it before daybreak Wednesday. The declaration of martial law was the first of its kind in more than 40 years in South Korea. Eighteen lawmakers from the ruling party voted to reject Yoon's martial law decree along with opposition lawmakers. The passage of Yoon's impeachment motion appeared more likely Friday when the chair of Yoon's party called for his removal on Friday, but the party remained formally opposed to impeachment. On Saturday, tens of thousands of people packed streets near the National Assembly, waving banners, shouting slogans and dancing and singing along to K-pop songs with lyrics changed to call for Yoon's ouster. A smaller crowd of Yoon's supporters, which still seemed to be in the thousands, rallied in separate streets in Seoul, decrying the impeachment attempt they saw as unconstitutional. Lawmakers on Saturday first voted on a bill appointing a special prosecutor to investigate stock price manipulation allegations surrounding Yoon's wife. Some lawmakers from Yoon's party were seen leaving the hall after that vote, triggering angry shouts from opposition lawmakers. If Yoon is impeached, his powers will be suspended until the Constitutional Court decides whether to remove him from office. If he is removed, an election to replace him must take place within 60 days. Opposition lawmakers say that Yoon's attempt at martial law amounted to a self-coup, and drafted the impeachment motion around rebellion charges. Lee Jae-myung, the leader of the main liberal opposition Democratic Party, told reporters that Yoon's speech was "greatly disappointing" and that the only way forward is his immediate resignation or impeachment. On Friday, PPP chair Han Dong-hun, who criticized Yoon's martial law declaration, said he had received intelligence that during the brief period of martial law Yoon ordered the country's defense counterintelligence commander to arrest and detain unspecified key politicians based on accusations of "anti-state activities." Hong Jang-won, first deputy director of South Korea's National Intelligence Service, told lawmakers in a closed-door briefing Friday that Yoon called after imposing martial law and ordered him to help the defense counterintelligence unit to detain key politicians. The targeted politicians included Han, Lee and Woo, according to Kim Byung-kee, one of the lawmakers who attended the meeting. The Defense Ministry said it had suspended the defense counterintelligence commander, Yeo In-hyung, who Han alleged had received orders from Yoon to detain the politicians. The ministry also suspended the commanders of the capital defense command and the special warfare command over their involvement in enforcing martial law. Former Defense Minister Kim Yong Hyun, who has been accused of recommending Yoon enforce martial law, has been placed under a travel ban and faces an investigation by prosecutors over rebellion charges. Vice Defense Minister Kim Seon Ho has testified to parliament that it was Kim Yong Hyun who ordered troops to be deployed to the National Assembly after Yoon imposed martial law. South Korea Protests Politics Seoul North Korea Asia Impeachment

Conference stresses urgent need for burn accident awareness

Article content Our navy is short thousands of sailors and struggling to build new ships, but they are looking after the important stuff – changing the official march song because it’s not woke. Recommended Videos Senior officers at the Royal Canadian Navy have spent four years discussing replacing Heart of Oak as their official march song. The song has been part of the Royal Canadian Navy since its inception, coming from the traditional march song of the Royal Navy in Britain. A briefing note drafted in December 2020 states there are three issues with the lyrics that are contrary to defence policy. Those issues include not being gender inclusive, celebrating a colonial past and a reference to slavery. “Disgusting,” one naval veteran said upon hearing about the attempt to change the song. “It’s all I’ve ever known,” said a still-serving officer who doesn’t support the move. No one should support the move; it’s ridiculous social justice crap not based in reality. Having read the lyrics and listened to the song, the reasons presented in the briefing note show a political agenda at work. “First, the line ‘to add something new to this wonderful year’ references Annus Mirabulis of 1759, various British victories as part of colonial conquests including over the French colony of Canada,” the briefing memo states. The Royal Canadian Navy is worried their march song celebrates a victory of Britain over France? That’s our history, deal with it, and yes, both Britain and France were colonial powers, France lost, move on. Secondly, the briefing note mentions the lyric “not press you like slaves,” which is today sung “as freemen not slaves,” and mentions that the Royal Navy had been involved in the slave trade. The more important thing to note is that no organization on the planet did more to eradicate slavery than the Royal Navy after Britain abolished slavery. The comment is historically ignorant to say the least. “Finally, the lyrics are not inclusive to all genders,” it states. The memo was drafted by Lt. Catherine Norris who is currently the Commanding Officer of the Central Band of the Canadian Armed Forces. Rather than simply delete the memo and the email it came with, officials decided to begin a process that has been going on for four years to find a new march song and throw out something that is part of Canadian naval tradition. “ Heart of Oak is very ingrained in the RCN, unlike a lot of commands/branches/units who couldn’t name or hum their march. However, I think it is worth pointing out the hypocrisy of changing the ranks be more inclusive while continuing to sing a March which isn’t,” wrote Lt. Norris. Seems having lyrics that refer to men and lads, but not to women or the other invented genders, just isn’t acceptable in the navy today. “One of the decisions at Admiral’s Council back in February was to replace Heart of Oak as the RCN march as it fails to meet muster on both GBA+ and Canadian grounds,” Vice Admiral Angus Topshee, the Commander of the Royal Canadian Navy, wrote in July 2022. For those not familiar with the term GBA+, it refers to Gender-based Analysis Plus, which is an official policy and commitment of the Canadian government under Justin Trudeau. “GBA Plus is an intersectional analysis that goes beyond biological (sex) and socio-cultural (gender) differences to consider other factors, such as age, disability, education, ethnicity, economic status, geography (including rurality), language, race, religion, and sexual orientation,” the government’s website states. Is there any military song that would be generic and inoffensive enough for this policy? The other day, Defence Minister Bill Blair said the Canadian Armed Forces as a whole are short 14,000 people. All three branches of the military are having trouble recruiting people join. Going woke and throwing military tradition away isn’t going to help that problem. blilley@postmedia.com